Rob
06-15-2007, 02:20 PM
US town set to ban saggy trousers
A mayor in the US state of Louisiana says he will sign into law a proposal to make wearing saggy trousers an act of indecent exposure.
Delcambre town council unanimously passed the ordinance earlier this week making it a crime to wear trousers that show underwear.
"If you expose your private parts, you'll get a fine" of US$500 (£254) Mayor Carol Broussard said.
Offenders will also risk up to six months in jail.
Fashionable
Speaking of people who wear saggy trousers, Mr Broussard told the Associated Press news agency: "They're better off taking the pants off and just wearing a dress."
Town attorney Ted Ayo said the ordinance expands on the existing state indecent exposure law by adding underwear to the list of forbidden exposures.
"This is a new ordinance that deals specifically with sagging pants," Mr Ayo said. "It's about showing off your underwear in public."
Some residents say the ordinance targets blacks, as low-slung trousers are fashionable among hip hop fans.
Mr Broussard denied it was racially motivated.
"White people wear sagging pants, too," he said.
From:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6751777.stm
:confused:
Now I don't think it's a particularly great fashion trend, in fact I think it looks a bit daft, but banning it? And because it's 'indecent exposure'? Is underwear 'indecent'?
I remember being at work (a grocery store) and a woman was crouched down looking at some things on the bottom shelf. You could quite clearly see a bit more than maybe you'd want to. It seems like it would be appropriate to fine people for that happening, given the above story!
And this comment is just bizarre:
Speaking of people who wear saggy trousers, Mr Broussard told the Associated Press news agency: "They're better off taking the pants off and just wearing a dress."
Where the hell does that come from?
A mayor in the US state of Louisiana says he will sign into law a proposal to make wearing saggy trousers an act of indecent exposure.
Delcambre town council unanimously passed the ordinance earlier this week making it a crime to wear trousers that show underwear.
"If you expose your private parts, you'll get a fine" of US$500 (£254) Mayor Carol Broussard said.
Offenders will also risk up to six months in jail.
Fashionable
Speaking of people who wear saggy trousers, Mr Broussard told the Associated Press news agency: "They're better off taking the pants off and just wearing a dress."
Town attorney Ted Ayo said the ordinance expands on the existing state indecent exposure law by adding underwear to the list of forbidden exposures.
"This is a new ordinance that deals specifically with sagging pants," Mr Ayo said. "It's about showing off your underwear in public."
Some residents say the ordinance targets blacks, as low-slung trousers are fashionable among hip hop fans.
Mr Broussard denied it was racially motivated.
"White people wear sagging pants, too," he said.
From:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6751777.stm
:confused:
Now I don't think it's a particularly great fashion trend, in fact I think it looks a bit daft, but banning it? And because it's 'indecent exposure'? Is underwear 'indecent'?
I remember being at work (a grocery store) and a woman was crouched down looking at some things on the bottom shelf. You could quite clearly see a bit more than maybe you'd want to. It seems like it would be appropriate to fine people for that happening, given the above story!
And this comment is just bizarre:
Speaking of people who wear saggy trousers, Mr Broussard told the Associated Press news agency: "They're better off taking the pants off and just wearing a dress."
Where the hell does that come from?

